More details about ballpark shooting, more questions about White Sox’s reponse

Guaranteed Rate Field
(Photo by Kamil Krzaczynski/USA TODAY Sports)

If two fans were struck by bullets in the left-field bleachers in Guaranteed Rate Field in May instead of August, it might still have a bigger hold on the news cycle, because … holy hell, how could that even happen. As it stands, the Bears are underway and producing an overload of their own drama (and maybe legally actionable offenses) while the White Sox deserve to be neglected for every other reason, so there’s less to maintain the public’s attention in the absence of any new leads on where the bullets actually came from.

That part still remains unknown, but ABC7 and the Chicago Sun-Times produced new information on some aspects of the incident.

The Chicago TV station interviewed one of the victims, the 42-year-old woman who suffered leg wounds. She’s chosen to remain anonymous, and she gave her account:

“It wasn’t until a couple moments later that somebody mentioned that there was a bullet found a couple of rows down,” she said. “And at that moment was when I realized I had been shot. I panicked. I completely went into panic mode, knowing that there was a bullet fired nearby us. And at that point I didn’t know if it was there was going to be more gunfire. I didn’t know anything. I was terrified. I wanted to get out of that area because I knew somebody in the immediate area had a gun on them.”

She denies sneaking a gun into the ballpark and said she’s fully cooperated with police, who haven’t contacted her since the day after the shooting. She also said she’s never owned a gun, but the police report noted that she possesses a firearm owner’s ID card, which is a dissonant detail.

Perhaps the biggest knock on her credibility came at the end of the interview, when reporter Craig Wall asked her if she’s returned to the park since the incident.

“Unfortunately, I have not,” she said. “There have been several games that I’ve had tickets to that I really wanted to attend. I have not been able to bring myself to go to a game.”

Nobody really wants to attend a White Sox game right now, so you have to question every other part of her story.

Gallows humor aside, you’d think that if police could determine that one of the victims brought a gun into the ballpark and shot herself, they’d bring charges and proceed with the case. Then again, if that information managed to reflect poorly on police and/or the White Sox, perhaps they’d just want the story to fade away.

The Sun-Times story doesn’t have any answers on that front, but it revealed a new tangle in who was in charge. Tom Schuba reported that one of Fred Waller’s last actions as acting police superintendent was demoting John Spellman, the commander of the patrol bureau, because he’d been working security at Guaranteed Rate Field without proper approval.

Spellman had been serving as a security supervisor for At Your Service LLC, the company that guards Sox park and is controlled by team executives, according to law enforcement sources.

There was concern that Spellman might have prioritized the interests of the team over the department and stalled in delivering McDermottโ€™s request to pause the game, a source said. He also didnโ€™t have the superintendentโ€™s approval to work the security job, as required by a departmental order.

The White Sox previously said that the decision to continue the game without interruption was entirely up to the police department

Scott Reifert, the White Sox vice president of communications, said the decision to allow the game to continue fell completely to the police department, and he acknowledged that officials consulted with the teamโ€™s security personnel.

โ€œIt was determined that there was no immediate threat, and so the game proceeded,โ€ he added.

… but if somebody working for the White Sox, or an entity tied to White Sox executives, clouded the police department’s response, then that certainly calls into question the team’s credibility. Perhaps that’s why Reifert isn’t saying anything now:

Scott Reifert, vice president of communications for the Sox, didnโ€™t respond to questions. He previously confirmed that Spellman worked for At Your Service.

Even if the bullets originated from well outside the ballpark, here’s an example of the White Sox making their own luck, because it turns out baseball operations isn’t the only department where it’s unclear who reports to whom. The difference is that Kenny Williams trading Jake Burger without Rick Hahn’s knowledge didn’t result in anybody going to the hospital. A potential cover-up involving basic fan safety is a whole different matter, although with attendance already plummeting, it’ll be difficult to separate the effect of one mess from the other.

Author

  • Jim Margalus

    Writing about the White Sox for a 16th season, first here, then at South Side Sox, and now here again. Letโ€™s talk curling.

    View all posts
Take a second to support Sox Machine on Patreon
Become a patron at Patreon!
21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GrinnellSteve

Taking fan murdering to a whole new level.

As Cirensica

It’s a holistic new culture turning gaiety festivities parades into inexplicable events with macabre undertones.

Wayne

 she possesses a firearm ownerโ€™s ID card

I had a FOID card in Illinois at 10 or 12 years old. I was a minor and did not own a firearm. So it can be “technically correct” to have a FOID and never owned a firearm.

But having a FOID does make it likely that she has owned one in the past.

joewho112

Why does one get a FOID card without getting a gun? Just like you intend to get a get but by the time your card gets approved you’ve changed your mind.

Right Size Wrong Shape

I’ve had a FOID card for a couple of years, but haven’t yet purchased a firearm. I’d like to go through training first so that I feel like I’d know how to handle it safely, but just haven’t had the time to do it.

what

You’ve been able to apply online for years so some people did that just because it was a 10 dollar card for 10 years. I recall my family being concerned about enough people in the house being registered in case something happened like neither parent was around but the police came, so I got registered at like 15. Idk if their was a newstory that spoked them or what. I knew several kids as young as 12 who had theirs as well

what

Illinois is the only state with a system like FOID. Just a procedural step to get one for some people

ChiSportsDrummerMJ

This story is one that gets the conspiracy theorists going. Too much unknown that the mind can create its own narrative about it. The White Sox have never been good at getting in front of things, just reacting to what happens and acting the victim somehow, but it would be nice for some clarity on the matter. IF this is some massive cover up or simply a mistake that resulted in a news story due to personal safety concerns, but ultimately has an embarrassing truth behind it, then own it, get in front of this and perhaps that would be the end. Instead they are dragging it out with muddying information to create confusion with the hope people move on. 2023 isn’t 1985, so again the White Sox display an outdated approach to handling adversity in my opinion.

JazznFunk

What I question is the need to have a coverup if something was just an innocent mistake at security. It wouldn’t be a good look, but if something got through, I think they could just say they will review procedures and do better in the future. Others might feel differently, but given that this level of security at ballparks is a relatively new phenomenon (and not something I experienced most of my fandom), I could accept that. But if it isn’t that and the origin was not from outside the ballpark, then it can get conspiracy theorists pretty excited.

It would also be interesting to know what MLB is doing in all this. Because it seems like the kind of thing the league office would take an interest in, including how it was handled on game day. And I would think they would want to know exactly what happened

Last edited 1 year ago by JazznFunk
itaita

Even the MLB front office is tired of dealing with the White Sox.

GrinnellSteve

The inability to admit a mistake, apologize for it, learn from it, and move on is one of the greatest character flaws (corporate character in this case) I can think of. Some people would rather chew off their own testicles than show “weakness.” The coverup expends so much unnecessary negative energy, and it destroys credibility. The real weak person is the one who can’t admit a mistake.

I used to tell my furniture store employees, “If a customer asks you a question and you don’t know the answer, look them in the eye and say, ‘I don’t know, but I’ll find out.'” Unstated in that simple declaration is that the things you DO tell them are true, and they can believe you.

upnorthsox

The inability to admit a mistake, apologize for it, learn from it, and move on is one of the greatest character flaws (corporate character in this case) I can think of

Only to be tied by the inability of people to admit that mistakes happen, accept apologies, learn from it, and move on.

ParisSox

as a young lad, I made mistakes at the very small company I was working for but when confronted, totally denied it was me, when everyone knew it was me. Why? Because I was in an environment where lying about it was less embarrassing and punishing than admitting it. It wasn’t a culture of “everyone makes mistakes, let’s learn lessons and move on”. it was a culture of any mistake is bad, we expect perfection.

And I was immature. But with a better culture backing I believe I would have felt more comfortable to be more mature.

So you know, “build a culture”

ChiSportsDrummerMJ

The fact MLB has not done anything or released anything indicating they would get involved makes me wonder if there are details fans/media will never know simply because it would look bad on so many people. Have no idea if that’s true or not, but again the lack of clarity on anything outside someone was hit with a bullet during a game gets the mind spinning on what happened.

JazznFunk

As I understand it, the origin of today’s security was the Boston Marathon bombings. It was concern about terrorism that really got the ballpark security going.

“This procedure, which results from MLB’s continuing work with the Department of Homeland Security to standardize security practices across the game, will be in addition to bag checks that are now uniform throughout MLB,” baseball spokesman Michael Teevan said Tuesday.

The Seattle Mariners announced Tuesday that fans entering Safeco Field will have to walk through metal detectors starting with this year’s opener.

Boston, the New York Mets, Oakland, Pittsburgh and San Francisco were among the teams that experimented with screening at times last year. Security gained more intense focus after three people were killed and more than 260 wounded in when two bombs were set off at the Boston Marathon finish line.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2014/01/21/major-league-baseball-mlb-parks-metal-detectors-stadium-security/4736093/

Last edited 1 year ago by JazznFunk
King Joffrey

I hear the investigation is prepared to rule out Space Lasers, but is not yet ready to dismiss the โ€˜second shooterโ€™ theory.

David
  1. Is there a grassy knoll in Bridgeport?
  2. Seriously, how do you NOT NOTICE that you have a gunshot wound until someone mentions that there was a bullet found several rows away?
  3. As irresistible as the belly-fat theory is, I canโ€™t believe someone could fire a gun in a stadium and no one else heard or saw it. As much fun as it is to rag on White Sox security and management and general incompetence, the outside-the-stadium scenario is the only one that is remotely plausible.
Root Cause

No one will ‘own’ this decision. Fear of a future lawsuit or criminal charge could spring up later. They will keep hiding a ball with 3 cups until everyone loses interest.

To Err is Herrmann

The White Sox have a vice president of communications? What has he been doing the past 10 years, sitting in his office scrolling the internet on his phone?

FishSox

The mugshot of the perpetrator is a picture of Jerry’s middle finger…

… Again

StockroomSnail

Jerry definitely is randomly firing into the crowd, brandy snifter in hand.