Statcast’s pace leaderboard shows White Sox pitchers have slowed down with the age

(Photo by Keith Allison)

There aren’t many reasons to miss the way the White Sox used to be, because they could stand to improve upon just about everything they’ve ever done.

But Statcast’s new pitch tempo leaderboard made me feel a little bit nostalgic for the days when:

  1. White Sox pitchers stayed healthy.
  2. White Sox pitchers worked fast as hell.

The metric goes al lthe way back to 2010, and the White Sox dominate the leaderboard, with Buehrle, Clayton Richard and John Danks finishing 1-2-3. Richard was a member of the Padres by then, sent to San Diego in the Jake Peavy deal, but his lightning-fast pace was a trademark of his days coming up the White Sox system, and his brief time on the 25-man roster.

Over subsequent years, Chris Sale cracked the top 10, but aside from the brief, glorious run of Andre Rienzo, the White Sox have had precious few pitchers remember that the optimal game state involves them in the dugout, not on the field.

(The Rienzo post reminds me of a stupid video I very much enjoyed making.)

Smash-cut to 2022, and the first White Sox pitcher doesn’t make an appearance on the league-wide list until Tanner Banks, whose pace of 17.4 seconds between pitches with the bases empty is good for a tie for 141st, followed by Johnny Cueto in the group 11 spots behind at 17.5 seconds.

The fastest White Sox pitchers work slower than all but two members of the White Sox pitching staff 10 years ago, when Jesse Crain (18.5 seconds) and Addison Reed (18.9) put together the longest innings. In 2022, Dylan Cease is the only other active pitcher who gets rid of the ball in less than 20 seconds, with Matt Foster bringing up the rear at 24.9 seconds in between pitches with the bases empty.

Here’s how it looks:

John Danks (12.8)Reynaldo López (15.1)Tanner Banks (17.4)
Chris Sale (13.1)Carlos Rodón (15.1)Johnny Cueto (17.5)
Hector Santiago (13.4)Dylan Covey (15.8)Dylan Cease (19.5)
Dylan Axelrod (13.6)Derek Holland (16.3)Kendall Graveman (20.5)
Francisco Liriano (14.0)David Holmberg (16.8)Vince Velasquez (20.7)
Philip Humber (14.3)José Quintana (17.1)Michael Kopech (21)
Matt Thornton (14.8)Miguel González (17.9)Liam Hendriks (21.3)
José Quintana (15.4)James Shields (18.2)Reynaldo López (21.7)
Jake Peavy (15.4)Mike Pelfrey (18.2)Bennett Sousa (21.9)
Gavin Floyd (16)Juan Minaya (18.3)Aaron Bummer (22.3)
Nate Jones (16.3)Gregory Infante (19.5)Lucas Giolito (23.0)
Jesse Crain (18.5)Anthony Swarzak (21.4)Matt Foster (24.9)
Addison Reed (18.9)Dan Jennings (21.9)
Chris Beck (22.4)

I was surprised to see Velasquez in the middle of the pack, but if you’re thinking he goes about his business like a sloth on quaaludes, his pace is nearly six seconds slower with a baserunner aboard. There’s a separate leaderboard for pace with traffic, but the dramatic delay when no other variables distills the issue well enough. Look no further than López, who loses six seconds of pace over the course of five years before holding baserunners is even a concern.

FROM 2020: Let’s make Lucas Giolito show how fast Mark Buehrle worked

This is why the pitch clock of 14 seconds with the bases empty (and 18 seconds with runners on) is as radical a notion as it is historical. It wasn’t all that long ago that 14 seconds was an unremarkable amount of time, because I don’t recall anybody marveling about how swiftly Francisco Liriano went about his business. Yet because standards for expediency have fallen so far, it’s hard to watch a minor-league game in 2022 without getting winded.

I used to be against pitch clocks for all the typical aesthetic and romantic reasons, but also because the White Sox didn’t require one. But now that nobody followed their lead — not even the White Sox themselves — there’s no telling how slow the game could devolve without one. Should Major League Baseball implement one, it’s going to drastically change the way pitchers do business, but at least Minor League Baseball appears to be providing a working proof of concept when it’s up for discussion after the season.

Statcast also tracks hitters, but there’s a much narrower spread, with fewer than three seconds separating Josh Harrison (16.4) at the top and José Abreu (19.2) at the bottom. The tool was more useful to confirm my suspicion about Conor Gillaspie somehow moving slower than anybody during his time with the Sox, even though he didn’t have batting gloves to adjust.

Take a second to support Sox Machine on Patreon
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We had the opportunity last night to see the human rain delay, David Price, although he moves quicker now that he’s a reliever. His slow pace was a masterpiece in idiotic strategery where he sought to aggravate batters with his slow rhythm.

I was happy to see him get shelled, for no other reason than he pissed off every fan of the game with his antics.

Last edited 1 year ago by FishSox

Long breaks between pitches seem to let pitchers throw harder
It was a competitive advantage when teams like Boston were taking a uniquely long time. I, likewise, welcome the pitch clock and hope it will reduce pitchers throwing max effort. Hopefully the pitchers can be healthier and offense won’t be so suppressed.

Greg Nix

Wow, pretty vast difference! Great post, Jim. Definitely illustrates the need for a pitch clock.


Yes. This analysis of how much the game has changed in the recent past provides a good analogy to the NBA implementing the shot clock in 1954.

It’s been eight years, and the league Ferris helped create is perilously close to becoming just another relic of the 1950s. Viewership has plummeted, causing the 18 original teams to dwindle to just nine. As the pace of the game has slowed to a halt, so too has the NBA’s notoriety. 

The trio can’t bear to watch the game they love erode at the hands of a statistical revelation, so they’re working on devising their own association.

Not only that, the Nationals, one of the speediest teams in the league, were being stymied from running their ideal offense. They were in search of a solution that would not only save the NBA, but the hopes of their team.

And so it was that, on the back of a napkin, the most important formula in NBA history was born. 

It was not the product of a painstaking regression analysis; no lofty arithmetic was required in the process. In fact, they probably didn’t even use a calculator. From analyzing box scores from the previous season, they merely deduced that the most entertaining games usually featured each team hoisting about sixty shots, or 120 per game. That number was divided by 48 minutes, or 2,880 seconds, the total time of an NBA game. The end product? 24 seconds.


This is funny. When I fall behind watching MLB tv you can basically watching pitch to pitch by clicking ahead between pitches. I think it’s 15 seconds per click.


Same. I watch almost all the games after the fact and regularly skip ahead to the next pitch. Ironically a 14 sec timer would make games longer for me because I’d have to watch them in their entirety.

Last edited 1 year ago by shaggy65

In 2010, Freddie Garcia was 53rd fastest out of 300+?

No way this is accurate.😒


I’m struck by how awful that 2017 staff was. A lot of names I don’t need to read again ever.


Incredible name.


It’s like a drunk’s third attempt to say Parking Meter


Hey, leave TLR out of this.