omar vizquel

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Numbers rackets

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Wooooooooo!

On the heels of a big announcement about numbers, I have one of my own.

Ladies and Gentlemen, White Sox Outsider 2010 will be about five pages longer than its predecessor!

It’s checking in at 226 pages, not counting the extraneous pages before (title, contents, etc.) and after (index). Rough math suggests that the new book will be 2-3 percent better.

Later tonight, I’ll be taking it to Kinko’s and printing it out, putting it a binder and reading the entire thing, making sure the pages flip right and nothing ends abruptly.

In the meantime, Carl Skanberg has posted one of the section fronts at Smells Like Mascot.

FURTHER BULLETINS AS EVENTS WARRANT!

*******************************

Omar Vizquel didn’t want to risk letting No. 17 injure him, so instead he called a Hall of Fame shortstop for a favor. The result?

The White Sox announced Monday that Aparicio has given his consent for Omar Vizquel to wear No. 11 in his first year with the White Sox, as the number will be un-retired by the organization for Vizquel to wear in tribute. Vizquel termed such largesse coming from his countryman as a “tremendous honor.”

I wasn’t thrilled by this development initially, being a noted White Sox historian (*COUGHWHEEZESPUTTER*) and all. Then I read the story, and stopped caring for two reasons.

No. 1: It’s a Venezuelan thing. Ozzie Guillen wears No. 13 in tribute of Dave Concepcion.  That’s the same number Vizquel wore before joining the Sox.  Asdrubal Cabrera, Cleveland’s Venezuelan shortstop, also wears No. 13, and for the same reason.

If Vizquel isn’t able to honor any of the most recent Venezuelan shortstops, I don’t see the problem in letting him ask the most legendary living fellow countryman.  It’s one tradition butting heads with another, and Aparicio is probably a better arbiter than Guy Whitey Corngood over here.

No. 2: White Sox numbers ain’t sacred. Some franchises treat retiring numbers more seriously than the Vatican considers canonization. Jerry Reinsdorf, on the other hand, panicked on one July 1989 day and retired Harold Baines’ number as something to remember him by.  That’s a precedent preventing me from being aghast right there.  The Sox have played fast and loose with the unwritten rules before, and that they are possibly bastardizing an institution they previously cheapened doesn’t strike me as being worthy of horror.

Click to continue »

Small deal, big deal for Vizquel

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Omar Vizquel, upon having officially signed with the White Sox for one year and $1.375 million, spoke to the media at a press conference, where the team made a big deal over what uniform number he would take and how he would play a part in a legacy at shortstop.

I don’t remember the Sox making a huge deal when they traded for Alex Cintron.  But hey, it’s always nice to see Luis Aparicio.

vizquel1124

Amid the pomp and circumstance, Ozzie Guillen mentioned an unanticipated (at least by me) consequence of this signing that bears watching:

“We will try and find [Vizquel] a lot of playing time, especially early in the year because everyone knows Ramirez struggles early either because of the weather or over-training.”

This is valid criticism, and hopefully it’ll turn into an effective motivational tool.  Through the team’s first 30 games last season, Ramirez had a line of .198/.240/.260 — and yet he had started in 27 of them because Brent Lillibridge was the sole alternative for most of that stretch.

Let’s just hope that Vizquel’s presence doesn’t make Ozzie jump the gun too quickly in case Ramirez starts 2010 with a bad first week.  After two weeks?  Then it may be time to make a change.

I wouldn’t worry about Vizquel getting that much playing time, if only because he took No. 17.  The last three players to wear it — the injury-prone Chris Getz, Darin Erstad and General Soreness.

Old news: On Vizquel, Jenks and Contreras

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

There’s still time for Omar Vizquel to change his mind, you know.

The rumored one-year deal to aquire the quadragenerian shortstop hasn’t been made official; MLB.com, the Trib and Sun-Times are all calling it varying degrees of “close.”

Back in 2004, all outlets were saying the same thing as the Sox and Vizquel worked toward a two-year deal.  The Trib’s headline read “close,” the Sun-Times’ version said “imminent.”  Then in came the Giants with an extra year, and Vizquel took off for San Francisco, leaving shortstop in the unreliable hands of Juan Uribe, and we know how that turned out.

Anyway, I went to the archives to see if there was any perceivable bad blood between the two parties.  Judging from Kenny Williams’ quotes in a Scot Gregor story from Nov. 16, 2004, nope.  While he was described as “shock,” he seemed to chalk it up to the business:

“It was obviously disappointing,” Williams said. “But the Giants saw fit to trump our offer and that put them over the top. That’s the bottom line.”

I imagine if Williams had any hard feelings, they were erased when he won a World Series ring. Vizquel is still looking for one.

(Also found while looking through the November 2004 archives — some Trib reader named J.J. making the argument for the Sox to acquire Alfonso Soriano.)

Click to continue »