posted on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 2:38 AM by Jim

Determining White Sox trade values

One of the great things about the offseason is that it allows your imagination to run wild.

On the other hand, sometimes that's not a good thing:

I agree with you Joe on how the Sox need to get faster and younger. However, they shouldn't get rid of them without some value back. Trade Javy, OC, and Thome to Padres for Peavy. If he's healthy, he will be good. Secondly, trade Crede and Griffey to Angels for Figgins. He's fast and still young. Trade PK and Uribe to Arizona for Hudson. That would be a good offseason. Plus, the Sox could take chance on Fukudome, now that Cubs are done with them, he could play Center, who knows, he could be better in AL, like Josh Hamilton.

This kind of makes me a bit sad, actually, because though Major League Baseball's offseason has yet to begin, we already have a winner for "The Most Absurd Trade Proposal Said or Written With A Straight Face."  The layers are incredible:
  • Sending $30-35 million worth of declining players -- including one not even under Sox control -- for the 2007 NL Cy Young winner.  With the only question being Peavy's health.
  • Trading two players not under Sox control and of no interest to the Angels for a guy not under their control.
  • Giving away two mildly useful position players for a guy not under Arizona's control.
Add it all up, and of the 10 players involved, five are free agents.  And yet while I laugh, it's with a heavy heart.  I don't see how anything can compare.

However, please alert me if there's a contender, because if we find out the owner of the above proposal is nine years old, then the competition is wide open again.  I wouldn't hold it against a kid -- when I was that age, I thought I would be cracking the White Sox or Oakland rotation by 2002.  My control was that good.

There are a bunch of people who make farcical trade proposals without the excuse of inexperience, though, so I figured it might be a worthwhile exercise to figure out what tradeable White Sox players are worth at this point.  And if it isn't worthwhile, it's not like there's a lot to talk about, anyway.

Two disclaimers:

No. 1:  I've pared down the list to 36 players.  There are some in the rookie leagues and low minors who have shown some potential, but wouldn't be worth talking about because what they might be worth far exceeds what they're worth now, and thus are very unlikely to be traded.  The Cheat covered some of them in a minor-league post yesterday and today.

No. 2:  I wouldn't say that any of these players are truly indisposable, because it's Kenny Williams we're talking about here.

BLOW KENNY AWAY
  1. John Danks
  2. Carlos Quentin
  3. Gordon Beckham
  4. Aaron Poreda
Danks is the most valuable member of the White Sox because he 1) isn't even arbitration-eligible, 2) has no injury history (knock on wood), 3) turned in a non-fluky All Star-caliber season, and 4) is the type of pitcher who can succeed anywhere.  The only question mark is pure speculation, in that the unprecedented increase in his workload could lead to a Fausto Carmona-type setback next year.

Quentin has had surgery on three different parts -- elbow, shoulder and now his wrist.  But even if he never punched his bat, he'd be a solid second due to having a few years on Danks.  That shouldn't be an insult.

Poreda could fall into the second group, because there is a gap between his stock and Beckham's, through no fault of his own.  However, given the rarity of hard-throwing lefties who can start, I see no reason to move him for anything less than an absolute bonanza.

IT'LL COST YOU

     5.  Alexei Ramirez
     6.  Bobby Jenks
     7.  Mark Buehrle
     8.  Gavin Floyd
     9.  Nick Swisher
     10.  Jermaine Dye
     11. Matt Thornton

Why are all these players in the same group?  The best way I can explain it:  They all are highly valuable, but if I heard they were traded, I wouldn't immediately say "Mother-father!" because they each have question marks.

If Ramirez had a little more patience at the plate, he would probably catapult into that first group due to his ridiculously affordable contract.  That said, a wrist injury could transform him into an unremarkable player, because he isn't all that great as a defender or baserunner outside of a few memorable moments.

Buehrle manned up this year beyond belief, but there are reasons why he was often compared to Barry Zito.  Any team would want his talent, but a lot of teams wouldn't want his contract, though the Sox were very lucky to sign him to only a four-year deal.

Floyd and Swisher are talented but inconsistent, though their stars are going in different directions right now.  Floyd probably needs to repeat his performance to completely clear his name.  Thornton's had two great years around one bad year, and is only a reliever.

Dye is the best bet of the bunch, and while he only has one year left, some teams might see that as a bonus, as he probably only has one decent year left as an outfielder.  Right now, I see him being the guy dealt to free up the logjam at the corner/DH spot.

YOUNG TALENT WITH SOMETHING TO PROVE

     12.  Josh Fields
     13.  Clayton Richard

One year ago, there was no way to justify putting these two next to each other on such a list. But Fields hurt his knee in April and never fully recovered while Richard took advantage of every opportunity handed to him, and there you go.

A lot of Sox fans are burned out on Fields, but I think some teams would love to try to mold him -- the Texas Rangers jump to mind, immediately.  Teach him how to hit a fastball and he's a completely new player. Richard is still raw, but showed an ability to adjust after some early beatings.  Factor in the left-handedness, and I'm sure a lot of teams would listen.

VETERANS FOR SALE

     14.  Octavio Dotel
     15.  Javier Vazquez
     16.  Jim Thome

Dotel leads this group because he's the kind of guy who deserves one-year contracts.  He gets a boost because the projected Elias free agent place him squarely in the Type A group.  The Brewers used that to justify trading for Scott Linebrink a year ago, because although they gave up a couple talented arms, they at least got a couple draft picks in the deal.

(Linebrink, by the way, is a Type B now.  Oog.)

Vazquez has two years and $23 million left on his contract, which could be considered anything from a relative bargain to a potential albatross.  His no-trade clause is far less prohibitive than Thome's.  Thome is only a DH at this point, but production from that position was so poor across the league last year that he could theoretically have suitors.  The league-wide OPS at DH has slipped from .819 to .802 to .775 over the last three years.

STUCK WITH THEM, BUT IT COULD BE WORSE

     17.  Scott Linebrink
     18.  A.J. Pierzynski
     19.  Paul Konerko

If Linebrink makes it through a full season in 2009, he jumps to the next group.  As it stands, nobody will take on a three-year, $15 million commitment for a reliever with recent shoulder issues.

Pierzynski is far more valuable to the Sox than to anybody else, and Konerko has no-trade rights on top of every other reason why teams wouldn't be interested.  However, I wouldn't stick a fork in him yet.

REASONS FOR INTRIGUE

     20.  Brian Anderson
     21.  Adam Russell
     22.  Chris Getz
     23.  Jerry Owens
     24.  Mike MacDougal

Anderson provides Gold Glove-caliber defense, and his bat has shown signs of being fourth-outfielder quality.  Once again, a team like the Rangers or Phillies might be able to do wonders with that, but unlike with Fields, time isn't on Anderson's side.

Getz could help teams in a Jamey Carroll sort of way, and Owens was an asset for a month before injuries derailed all momentum.  Russell and MacDougal are two pitchers with good arms and control issues, and that MacDougal never allows homers will probably give him two or three more chances to prove himself.

LIMITED UPSIDE, AND FURTHER AWAY

     25.  John Shelby
     26.  Lance Broadway
     27.  Jack Egbert
     28.  Lucas Harrell
     29.  Derek Rodriguez
     30.  Justin Cassell.
     31.  Cole Armstrong
     32.  Brandon Allen

In my mind, Shelby ranks much higher on this sort of list than a real prospect list because he's shown a couple above-average tools -- the kind teams think they could work with if they have confidence in teaching some strike zone control.  He could drop like a rock if Birmingham's as unkind to him as I fear.

Harrell needs to pitch a full season, and since Rodriguez is a 25-year-old reliever who hasn't reached the majors, he's down here, too.  They have better stuff, however, than Broadway and Egbert, whose lack of out pitches led to big setbacks.  Cassell could be due for a rude awakening in Charlotte as well for the same reason.

Armstrong and Allen are coming off their first above-average years after lackluster track records.  Allen had better year offensively, but Armstrong plays a premium defensive position, whereas Allen reportedly struggles at first.

MASSET THEORY IN PRACTICE

     33.  Ehren Wassermann
     34.  Kyle McCulloch
     35.  Boone Logan

Every team has guys like these -- hell, the Sox had two Wassermanns in Charlotte if you count Jason Childers.  All signs indicate he's more Shingo Takatsu than Chad Bradford, which means he has a fine Triple-A career ahead of him.

McCulloch is basically Nick Masset without any rumors of a 98 m.p.h. fastball.  We now know that when you pair him with a talent that belongs in the "Reasons for Intrigue" group, you can get an overpriced, over-the-hill future Hall of Famer to play out of position for a couple months.

Logan continues to be a charming idea gone horribly awry.  Though he has a much better arm, he wishes he had Wassermann's ability to pitch.

(If you're unfamiliar with the Conservation of Masset Theory, it can be boiled down to one sentence: No matter how much Masset you use up, there is always Masset in your system.  It remains Larry's greatest contribution to the world to date.)

DEWON DAY

     36.  Dewon Day

COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE WOULD BLOCK IT, ANYWAY
 
     37.  Jose Contreras

Good luck with your rehab, Count.  Maybe he can pull a Dustin Hermanson and show up in September, giving the crowd a chance to salute a 2005 hero one more time in the final month of his contract.

So that's my stab at arranging the White Sox roster in terms of trade value.  I hesitate to suggest what they could bring back in a deal, but a good rule of thumb is that once you get past Dotel-Vazquez-Thome territory, the onus falls on the Sox to sweeten the deal if they want any major-league contributors in return.

Feel free to disagree or add any players I didn't name to the list.  I can be swayed to make changes if your argument is good enough, or mine is proved to be bad enough.

**********************

Arizona Fall League roundup:

  • Peoria 11, Surprise 6
    • Derek Rodriguez picked up the win with a scoreless inning, walking one and striking out one.
    • Cole Armstrong had an RBI single in four at-bats, but struck out twice.

Comments

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:12 AM by bobleeswagger
That trade proposal has it all and will certainly be tough to beat. But I've got a couple trade ideas of my own. What if the Sox can trade Boone Logan to the Bears for Devin Hester? That would solve some of our speed problems and I'm sure the Bears could use a lefty opposite Kyle Orton. What about Bo Jackson and Jack McDowell to the Brewers for CC??? I know he threw a lot of innings towards the end of this year but I think he'd be a solid #2 or 3 starter for the Sox behind Danks. What the Sox definitely need to do though is trade Crede for some top pitching prospects and sign King Kong to play 3rd base... if they could just teach him some patience at the plate that guy could be AWESOME!

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:18 AM by Fundman
And what about Senor Jenks? Would KW trade him or does the decreasing K's per 9 hurt him too much?

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:48 AM by MattTheRock
Kong's signed with the Yankees. They think he'll be a killer catcher once Posada's done. Hear he blocks the plate well.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:37 AM by HydeParkSox
I was a little puzzled to not see Jenks anywhere or DeWayne Wise (although Wise might be a FA).

As for Jenks, I would put him at number 6 just behind Ramirez. I do not think he is untouchable, but Kenny would have to get a pretty sweet return. His weight always scares me, but he has been pretty reliable over the last three years and he is pretty cheap (I think).

As for Wise, I don't know if he is a free agent or not, but unless Kenny does something for a good left handed bat in the outfield (please don't resign Griffey), I think we have to keep him. If you figure we have Dye and Quentin in the corner outfield spots, and Swish or Anderson in center then we need a left handed bat (other than Swish) to fill in from time to time against righties. He also brings some speed to the lineup and can hit 2nd, 8th or 9th.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:45 AM by Jim Margalus
Hyde's right -- Jenks should be No. 6. I think I overwrote him by mistake. Will correct shortly.

Wise is a FA. He makes me nervous, but not more so than Owens. And foul tips would make Kong angry.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 11:07 AM by striker
"when I was that age, I thought I would be cracking the White Sox or Oakland rotation by 2002" - LOL. I thought the same thing, and since watching The Rookie I have regained confidence it can still happen.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 11:17 AM by soxfan1
I like Jim's grouping of the Sox players. It's a good way to think about a difficult subject. Since trades are so difficult to pull off, I'm only looking for Kenny to make one or two. In my dream world, I'd like to see Vazquez dealt and Uribe/Logan/Day released. I also wouldn't mind seeing one of these three (Dye/Konerko/Thome) being dealt, but I doubt it will happen. Having said this I'll leave it to Kenny. His commitment to winning usually drives exciting off-season deals. A 2nd/3rd Sacker plus a CF & Bullpen arm would be welcome additions.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 11:54 AM by Conor
I could have made this up (I'm working on less than 2 hours sleep here) but I thought Dye had some sort of no trade clause that kicked in this year, with some other sort of provision last year. I dunno.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 11:57 AM by Jim Margalus
Dye has a partial no-trade (list of six teams). Nothing that can't be worked around.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:19 PM by Andrew
I agree Swisher would command a hefty price tag this winter, but that would probably have nothing to do with Swisher himself and almost everything to do with what the Sox gave up for him last winter.

Yes, he's relatively cheap in strictly financial terms, but the Sox have to know they can't get two pitching prospects and an outfielder the way Oakland did. And considering the other options out there at Swisher's positions, it's hard to see what team would view Swisher as enough of an improvement to give up anything of value for him.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 2:50 PM by eric
Oh my god Jim, "Mother-Father, Chinese Dentist!" is one of my all time fav Mr. Show moments.

In regards to trading, it's obviously hard to speculate, but I didn't mind Matt Cain's name being thrown around in a trade to the southside (despite flyball tendencies, general sweatiness, and lack of control).

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:18 PM by Jim Margalus
Andrew's right that Swisher has a completely different trade value, where he'd be a good candidate for a challenge/change-of-scenery deal. He'd get a good talent back in return, but it wouldn't come cheap right now.

Michael Young was the first guy I thought of, but I didn't realize how awful his contract is. If you think Paul Konerko is money poorly spent, check out Young's -- he's just entering a five-year, $80 million deal, and he'll be 32 and coming off a 96 OPS+ season.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:27 PM by chicityrob
here's what I'd do:
Crede, Griffey Jr. and Cabrera are FA's anyway so just let them leave.

and make two trades:
Thome(13M), Swisher(5.3m), and
(possibly Logan and/or H. ramirez) for
I Suzuki(17M). Seattle dying for left handed power and Dye has lost a step so he needs to DH/OF.

also

Dotel(6M), Broadway, Getz
for B. ROBERTS(8M)

The money is extremely cloase and leaves a lineup of:

1 Suzuki (RF)
2 Roberts (2B)
3 Quentin (LF)
4 Dye (DH)
5 Konerko (1B)
6 Ramirez (SS)
7 Pierzynski (C)
8 Fields (3B)
9 Anderson/Owens (CF)

speed and defense!
And since the money is so close you'd be free to go after AJ Burnett and/or a reliever.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:10 PM by Jim Margalus
I like some of your thinking, Rob, but there are a couple of hangups with those particular teams:

Seattle's management situation is completely FUBAR, in part because there's a faction in ownership that favors the Japanese players too much. They gave Johjima a ridiculous extension against Bavasi's wishes, and let Ichiro get away with murder even though most of the clubhouse wanted to kill him.

They asked the Sox permission to interview Rich Hahn for their GM spot, and the Sox rejected them. Probably because Hahn wouldn't want the spot. Nobody does. It's career suicide.

That said, I don't think Ichiro's expendable. At least not for a reasonable price for somebody who's 35 and coming off a career-worst season.

Baltimore's in the same situation, because Peter Angelos sets the asking price way too high. That's why Roberts hasn't gone anywhere despite being in trade talks for the past two seasons.

I don't see a situation in which Baltimore accepts Dotel as the centerpiece of a return. They'd want somebody who would be under their control and a major-league contributor, like Swisher, and that's not worth giving up for a one-year rental.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:56 AM by Joist
Oh man, the Dewon Day thing cracked me up.

It seems that a lot of people are forgetting the maxim of buy low, sell high. That's how Kenny got Quentin - his value was at an all-time low, so he was able to acquire him cheaply. Based on that ideal, I suggest the following:

1. Trade Jermaine Dye. His NTC is not an issue, he's affordable, and his numbers are pretty solid. Of all the Sox, he is in the top three of Sox players most likely to decline (along with Floyd and Uribe), and his defense just isn't cutting it. If possible, trade him for an infielder or two, because I'd also like to see...

2. Move Alexei to CF. This hasn't been talked about, at all, but it seems to me like there's a universal agreement that Alexei is a below-average SS. I would love to see him chase down fly balls in the gap. The only issue with this is that this leaves the Sox with exactly zero legitimate starting infielders besides Konerko. Without having perused the free agent list, I don't know if we can get a rental or something, but there's no way we're filling in all three of those positions from within the organization. Hopefully we can sign one FA IF and get another one in the Dye trade. Another reason to move Alexei is that Beckham is most valuable at shortstop.

3. Do NOT trade Vazquez. Look, I hated watching that excruciating end to his season as much as anybody, but there's no denying that his value would be at an all-time low right now, given the way he flamed out. We would get nothing back for him. If Floyd continues to flourish, stick Vazquez at the back of the rotation and hope for 200 league-average innings. If he reverts to 2007 form, so much the better. Then maybe we trade him after the '09 season, or even at midseason depending on the status.

Those are my three wishes. Genie, will you grant them?

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:39 AM by Jim Margalus
I pretty much agree with 1 and 3, but I think they have to see if Alexei can hack it at short for at least a season. I'd consider a move to center the last resort.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 11:48 AM by eric
Looking at Dewan's Fielding Bible Plus/Minus stuff, Alexei seems to have performed fairly even across the board at each position:

CF (63 innings): -2
SS (53 innings): -3
2B (1017 innings): -8

I'd be willing to put my money on his value, given his power numbers, is more potent at SS, where he has shown to be serviceable.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:27 PM by ballsdeep
I would not give up on Swisher. He's coming off the worst year of his career at the plate and had to play a position he is not a fit for defensively. Those aren't excuses, those are facts. He has age on his side and he's pretty cheap by MLB money standards. He belongs at first, in left or in right.

Because there is no depth in the farm system at all, in fact it seems rather barren, you'd think they would need to spend like crazy in order to survive but we know that won't happen. Too many holes to fill and not enough resources to do it.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:05 PM by Jim Margalus
I wouldn't pin that much on Dewan's system for that small a sample size. Griffey came ahead +1 as a CF, and we know that's not indicative of his true talents. He was lousy.

My estimate, unless Joey Cora can work some infield defense magic, is probably a -11 shortstop. Good hands, range on pop-ups, but poor range is what he's showing now.

I thought Swisher was OK in center, and that gives me an idea for a post tonight.

# re: Determining White Sox trade values

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:22 PM by ballsdeep
I am not sure that Ramirez can handle shortstop in the Majors. He should have been better at second than he was considering he played SS his entire life. Kenny might have to get creative in order to find a shortstop via trade. I don't think the Dodgers are letting Furcal go anywhere, for all you free agent dreamers out there.

Ramirez in CF might not be such a bad idea. You rob Peter to pay Paul because a hole would remain regardless of where Ramirez is (WB, CF, SS). Frankly, putting him in CF and having to fill three infield spots makes me kind of quesy. Then again, so would Fields at third-Ramirez at short and Getz at second.

Could be one of the most interesting off seasons in a long time.