Thursday, February 15, 2007 - Posts

I said, 'Stop!'


When I first saw the Sox's slogan for the 2007 season -- "Back to the Grind" -- I first thought of Police Academy 3.  I forget what exactly happens in that one, but I'm pretty sure it was the one where Mahoney gets involved with women, Tackleberry enjoys being armed and Jones makes all the sound effects with his mouth.  Hightower may have been tall, as well.

Thinking about it more than I should, Jim Thome would make a perfect Tackleberry -- freeze the clip three seconds in, after he takes off his sunglasses -- but now that Oprah incident pushes him closer toward Sweetchuck territory.

Sticking with the police theme, John Walsh of The Hardball Times -- not America's Most Wanted -- published his outfield arm ratings, and the Sox starting outfielders finish exactly where you think they would:

In short, Brian Anderson had the lowest "kill" rating of any center fielder, although he was the fourth-best at holding runners.  Jermaine Dye was the second-worst at throwing out runners at throwing out runners and was only average at holding them. 

And then there's Scott Podsednik. 

Pods had the third-lowest kill rating of left fielders (although placing ahead of Luis Gonzalez, who no longer has a throwing shoulder, isn't anything to be proud of).  That's not surprising, nor particularly alarming since no Sox outfielder fared well.

What is concerning is his hold rate -- at 91, it was the second-worst in the league.  When you look at his company and realize that these numbers aren't park-adjusted, it's downright pathetic.  Here's who is in his neighborhood:
  • Matt Holliday.  I was surprised to see him there until remembering he plays in the game's largest outfield.  He also happens to be paired with two of the game's strongest outfield arms, Willy Taveras and Brad Hawpe.
  • Pat Burrell.  Big guy, not particularly good instincts, but at least he has an arm to compensate.
  • Adam Dunn.  Minimal effort, maximum size.  The Reds' outfield makes the Sox's trio look positively elite.
  • Jason Bay.  A shoulder in worse shape than he lets on, and left field is the deep part of PNC.
  • Emil Brown.  Generally clumsy, but improving.
  • Alfonso Soriano.  RFK has the third-largest outfield in the game, I think, and it was his first year in the outfield.
Wow.  Walsh's ratings play to Podsednik's strengths -- U.S. Cellular doesn't offer a lot of ground to cover, and Pods has a great 40 time.  Considering getting to the ball quickly is as significant a detriment to advancing as a strong arm is, Pods should at least be average in this category.

Yet even with the system in his favor, he finds himself among a group of guys playing overweight, injured, and/or on a whole lot more real estate.  That's just atrocious.

Propping up the bar

Cliff Politte's found a home -- too bad it's with the Indians.

The former Sox right-hander signed a minor-league deal with Cleveland, and he'll have a lot of competition amongst declining veterans trying to earn a spot.  Among the other candidates are Keith Foulke and Joe Borowski. 

I'll be rooting for Cliff, while also hoping he doesn't have any measurable impact in adding to the Tribe's win total.  If that's possible.

************

I like this quote from Don Cooper regarding Jose Contreras' workout regimen:

"Contreras is a workaholic. Buehrle, he works, but he may have to change things. We want to make sure these guys can go to the post for 35 starts. It's a man's workload, for sure. Contreras has a program that is a strenuous one. What we've talked to him about, and Allen Thomas has talked to him about, is maybe he has to watch what he's doing.''

''Plus, Jose might be 50 or 60 years old, and that stuff might not be good for him anymore.  We don't know how old he is.''

If he can joke about it, I don't know why the rest of us can't.

************

Sam Smith's NBA mailbag has an interesting perspective on bloggers.  Somebody asked him what sites or blogs he reads, and he responded with "I don't read blogs."  Too much to C&P here, but here's the key quote:

How is it I can work for decades developing contacts around the NBA and traveling regularly around the NBA and talking with the decision makers and some guy in his basement in his underwear is writing something that has credibility? As close as I can figure, these bloggers are the electronic version of the neighborhood tavern. You used to go in and hear people wailing about sports or politics and offering opinions on all the major issues. We did our man in the street interviews when such issues came up. Now, these people we used to ask for opinion started these blogs and are supposed to be experts. How can that be? I never see any of them, I never hear the coaches and general managers and players I talk to saying they talked to them. So where do they get their information?

People often doubt the traditional media, but we are out asking questions, developing sources of information and interacting with the participants. What are these bloggers doing? I'm fortunate on some level to be getting close to retirement because if these blogs are credible sources of information, there's no point in spending all the time on the road that I do.

First off, I find it laughable that he thinks people like me sit around writing in their basement.  I don't even have one!

Seriously, I wouldn't be surprised if a Mark Gonzalez or Joe Cowley had a similar perspective, and I wouldn't necessarily blame them.  Beat writing is a demanding job, and journalism on the whole is difficult.  You basically risk looking stupid to hundreds of thousands of people every day, and nobody celebrates an errorless streak.  Screwing up in print makes for some terrible, terrible weeks, which I know first-hand.

That's why I try to measure my criticism of beat writers.  Columnists, since they aim to set the tone of the discussion, deserve the harder rebuttals.  That's part of their job.  But some bloggers spend 90 percent of their space ripping journalists who provide their only sources of information, and that's pretty arrogant.

There's nothing wrong with Smith's main argument, saying bloggers don't have the credibility of mainstream writers who build sources, have set-in-stone guidelines, editors and copy editors and all that.  I'd want to distance myself from the rumor-mongers and bile factories myself. 

On the other hand, I don't think bloggers are anything to be afraid of.  In fact, I'd think the good blogs would be a fertile source of story ideas, considering all the questions raised that nobody without a press pass has a way of definitively answering.  Of course there'd be a lot of trash out there, but that's no different from going through the email inbox every morning.

Only speaking for myself, I want this site to be a neighborhood tavern, not an ivory tower.  If you've read The Tender Bar by J.R. Moehringer (I'd recommend it), I'd say that I'd be perfectly happy playing the role of Steve, the respected bartender who oversees everything, directs traffic but only starts getting heavy-handed when the drunks get out of line.  Heck, I could even adopt the name "Jimbo's" since it sadly appears to be up for grabs.

Considering most good things are built upon open discourse, I'm not sure why mainstream journalists would feel threatened by them.  But considering I've written around 400,000 words on the White Sox and haven't been paid for a single one, I might be a little biased.

What's kind of funny is that my last extended rambling on journalism happened Feb. 12.  Must be something about pitchers and catchers' imminent reporting date that sets me off.  Or maybe it's just the snow this time:



Somewhere underneath that is my car.  And that was only half of the day's precipation enveloping it.