posted on Monday, November 05, 2007 12:48 AM by Jim

My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

My offseason plan centers on one guy – Bill Hall.

Without him, I settle for Juan Uribe at short and go on an extensive search for an outfielder.  But if Doug Melvin would take Jon Garland for the Milwaukee utilityman, the options grow considerably more entertaining, because he can hold down three positions – center field, shorstop and third base.

(Technically, he can hold down four, but I’m considering Danny Richar a lock at second. He showed enough -- and Aaron Cunningham was too costly a price -- to think otherwise.)

Instead of settling for a David Eckstein at short and Torii Hunter at center and paying handsomely for their declines in the process, Hall’s presence could afford the Sox time to trade their way towards an upgrade.  Possible candidates at each position:

Center:

Sox blogger offseason plans:

Coco Crisp:  Theo Epstein is asking for the moon right now – the San Diego Union-Tribune said the Padres would need to surrender Chase Headley, which isn’t happening.  With Hall and Josh Fields able to hold down the hot corner but play other positions as well, there’s no rush to deal Joe Crede.  The Sox could play the waiting game.

Johnny Damon:  Same deal, except he’s a worse fit, so the Sox could demand the Yankees to pay more of the $26 million owed to Damon over the next two years.  He gets on base, can run, hit double-digit homers and track a flyball reasonably well, but his arm makes Scott Podsednik look like Roberto Clemente.

Chone Figgins:  The Sox could plug him in at the top of the order while providing insurance for Danny Richar as well.  They’d finally have an excellent baserunner.

Any of these guys in between Jermaine Dye and Josh Fields would work well.  And Jose Guillen is still an option (more below).

Shortstop:

Khalil Greene:  Former Sox beat writer Nate Whalen mentioned Khalil Greene as a No. 2 hitter, although it would take Garland to get him.  They’re looking for a center fielder of the future – I wonder if Ryan Sweeney would intrigue them.  It’d probably help if Sweeney could manage one friggin’ double in Arizona.

Jack Wilson:  Two things happened to gum this one up – he hit like the dickens in the second half, and the Pirates dumped Dave Littlefield and hired a new GM.  With Littlefield at the helm, it wouldn’t be out of the question to offer Jerry Owens straight-up.  

Orlando Cabrera:  If Alex Rodriguez ends up in Los Angeles, the Angels may need to reallocate resources.  Cabrera, at a salary of $9 million, could be moved, and the Sox would appreciate his glove and a bat that keeps pitchers honest.

CONTINGENCY PLAN

If Hall can’t be pried loose for Jon Garland, then free agency seems the easiest route to upgrade the outfield.

Here’s my preferred order of outfielders:

1. Jose Guillen.  Guillen came up in an assessment of Torii Hunter a couple days ago, and while they’re very similar players, they each have inherent pros and cons.  Guillen can be a hothead, and also tends to miss a dozen or two games a year for various aches and pains.

On the other hand, Guillen’s questionable walk-to-strikeout ratio is bolstered by an inordinate number of hit by pitches, which he’s made a repeatable skill.  Add in his tremendous arm and good speed, and that would reduce the number of triples Jermaine Dye gave up last year.

He’s not considered in the class of the next three, so he should receive a shorter, cheaper deal for a similar kind of production.  Would three years, $30 million do it?

Then you shift Dye over to left, and let Jerry Owens, Ryan Sweeney and Brian Anderson battle it out in center.

2. Kosuke Fukudome.  If he could produce along the lines of Hideki Matsui, but with more speed and better defense, he'd be worth every penny.  Usual caveats about foreign players with no MLB experience apply.

3. Aaron Rowand.  The safe choice, PR-wise.

4. Mike Cameron.  He's older and will miss the first 25 games next year, but that should make him cheaper.

5. Torii Hunter.  He’s older than Rowand.

6.  Andruw Jones.  Would never happen.

At this point, here’s your lineup:
  1. CF - Owens – L
  2. 3B – Fields – R
  3. DH – Thome – L
  4. 1B – Konerko – R
  5. LF – Dye – R
  6. RF – Guillen – R
  7. C – Pierzynski – L
  8. SS – Uribe - R
  9. 2B – Richar – L
I think this is enough offense to win, since it’s basically going to come down with a better performance from the starters and bullpen, anyway.  The defense up the middle and the improvement in right will help them out.

Of course, this is only the rock bottom lineup, and could be re-arranged in various ways based on the assortment of possibilities listed above.  For instance, if there is room for both Hall and Guillen, you can bat Hall second and Fields down in the order.  Crisp, Damon or Figgins would bat leadoff, and so on.

In this scenario, where Joe Crede is not enough to get Coco Crisp, he’s shuttled off for relief help.  Scot Shields is a popular name, but the Angels would have to be awfully down on him for his 7.36 second-half ERA for that to happen.

BENCH

Locks:
Needs:
  • Fourth outfielder
  • Backup shortstop
  • Backup first baseman
Fourth outfielders are easy enough, whether it’s Brian Anderson/Ryan Sweeney or a free agent like Jeff DaVanon.

If Uribe's option doesn’t make financial sense, the shortstop issue is tougher, but here’s wondering if Ben Zobrist is available for an average bullpen arm.

I try my damndest to bring Ross Gload back in the fold – not only is he a great defensive replacement at first, but he can hit at the top of the order as well.

PITCHING
  1. Mark Buehrle
  2. Javier Vazquez
  3. Jose Contreras
  4. John Danks
  5. Gavin Floyd
Danks is the biggest question mark to me, but trading him at this point would be selling low.  He’s a cutter away from being far more reliable, and he’s got a hell of a role model in Mark Buehrle ahead of him in the rotation.  I think any extensive effort to move Danks would reek of desperation.

Jack Egbert, Charlie Haeger and Gio Gonzalez can also take their cracks at a rotation spot.

BULLPEN

As it stands:
  1. Bobby Jenks
  2. Matt Thornton
  3. Ehren Wassermann
  4. Mike MacDougal
  5. Boone Logan
  6. David Aardsma
Jenks and Wassermann earned their spots, and Thornton’s hard to replace, even if he had a lousy 2007.  Logan has the stuff to be a lights-out LOOGY, and I’d give him a spring to earn it.

The last two or three spots is where it gets dicey, because Aardsma and MacDougal are out of options.  I like Aardsma better, personally, but the Sox have less invested in him.  He could be intriguing to a team like Tampa Bay, in the aforementioned Zobrist idea.

The free agent pool is thin, but if I had to hand a two-year, $6 million deal to any of them, it’d be Luis Vizcaino.  The Hindenburg was a key part of the Yankee bullpen down the stretch last year, striking out a batter an inning in the second half.

I’d also consider it a failure if I didn’t end up with a Japanese candidate – the risk seems minimal.

If I had to go into the season with:
  1. Jenks
  2. Thornton
  3. Vizcaino
  4. MacDougal
  5. Wassermann
  6. Logan
  7. Japanese reliever
I’d feel as good about that any other realistic possibility.

EPILOGUE

One guy who I didn’t mention dealing was Paul Konerko.  I’m not opposed to shipping him out, but I think any deal involving Konerko would be selling low at this time.  At the trade deadline, his contract will be halfway through, and if he’s hitting .275/.360/.510, I think more teams wouldn’t balk at that line for $30 million over two and a half years.

At the same time, his price tag isn’t holding the Sox back, and they don’t have anybody to step in and replace his production.  If Konerko’s presence means Chris Carter can take his time and develop, I’m all for it.

Anyway, I'm exhausted.  At the minimum, I tried to create a plan that foresees repercussions from moves unrelated to the Sox and reasonably raises the payroll without adding additional albatrosses.  Feel free to poke holes in my hours of work.

Comments

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 6:47 AM by morsetoad
I would love to get Khalil Greene for Garland. He's a good to very good shortstop who's going to be 29 next year and appears to be into his power peak and would not have near the on base issues he has in Petco, as his BABIP has been significantly higher away than at home (according to fangraphs). He could go .280/.325/.500 at the Cell, though that might be optimistic since he'd be going from the NL to the AL. But .260/.310/.480 is still pretty nice. Like a better use of Uribe's skill set.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 10:08 AM by Jeff from AH
Jim,

Good call on Ross Gload, I was tossing this idea around a couple weeks ago stating how much the '07 club missed his versatility. I'm unsure of his contract status, perhaps arbitration eligible? Maybe Kenny can trade Sisco back to KC for Gload in return :) A player of similar ilk to Gload is a necessity in my opinion; it allows Konerko more defensive time off slipping him into the DH spot and provides insurance for the next Thome injury.

Unless a legitimate lead-off hitter like Figgons can be obtained, I like keeping Jerry Owens in the fold, he showed too much promise in the 2nd half last year.

I really do not like Fields batting in the two-hole...but understand the roster limitations as constituted. Hopefully our future short shop or even Richar could grow into that role.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 10:45 AM by larry
Regarding Konerko, if i'm not mistaken, he gets full no trade protection as a 10 and 5 next May. Obviously he can waive it but it's something to keep in mind if you're thinking of holding onto him until the trade deadline.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 2:16 PM by Gregory Pratt
You think Danks is a bigger question mark than Floyd? I hope you mean that in a, "Will he suck or won't he?" way as Floyd's has, IMO, been answered for us already. Danks is a big question mark but so's the rotation for me: Contreras? What'll do he? He's older and is having marital problems; Vazquez can be the last year and a half Vazquez or go back to being incapable of closing the deal; and while Buehrle always makes me comfortable, in the back of my mind I still remember his last two implosions.

As for the bullpen:

# Bobby Jenks
# Matt Thornton
# Ehren Wassermann
# Mike MacDougal
# Boone Logan
# David Aardsma

Yowza. Wasserman has little stuff and I don't expect him to be all that good, even as a "ROOGY" (you have no business in the Majors as just a ROOGY unless you're in a pen that is otherwise lights out: ours isn't); Thornton? I don't think he'll do all that well, with his one pitch and slightly decreased velocity; MacDougal is MacDougal; Aardsma is Aardsma; Boooooone is a LOOGY at best.

Man, that's not an inspiring bullpen.

# CF - Owens – L -- sucks.
# 3B – Fields – R -- alright Rookie season, but he'd better get on the fastball, fast, or else he's going to get knocked out and shown a fluke.
# DH – Thome – L -- Old. Should be relatively productive but he clogs the bases, can't do much but homer and get injured. (Don't misunderstand me: "Clog the bases" as typically derided isn't what I mean. But when you've got a lineup with Konerko, Dye, Guillen Pierzynski and Thome, followed by Uribe, you're doing some serious clogging. So I don't mean walks are bad -- no! But one-dimensional, lead-footed offense = bad.)
# 1B – Konerko – R -- Should start declining; up-and-down; good, not great. Who knows.
# LF – Dye – R -- Getting older.
# RF – Guillen – R -- Not all that good, but he's okay.
# C – Pierzynski – L -- Scares me.
# SS – Uribe - R -- Ugh.
# 2B – Richar – L -- I don't think I believe in him.

We'll see how I feel after spring training but this team gives me no confidence at all. And I'm not willing to bet that the pitching is ready or able to pick up the slack.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 7:36 PM by Jim Margalus
1. The one thing Uribe has on Greene is durability. I don't think Greene has any nagging issues, but this was the first year he played more than 140 games.

2. I believe this is Gload's last arbitration year. I'm guessing they'll tender him a contract, but it'd be nice if they decided not to in order to play Billy Butler more regularly.

3. 10-and-5 is a concern, but I don't think the Sox are in bad shape if they're stuck with him. I don't see a real reason to rush him off for a couple OK players (as is the case with the perpetual Angels rumor).

4. Danks is a bigger question mark because more is expected of him. If Floyd doesn't pan out, Floyd might be the only one disappointed, and Gio and Egbert can fight for it. But Danks was supposed to be ready to take the fourth slot this year, and if he doesn't rebound from his second half, that would put the Sox in a bind.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 8:25 PM by MattTheRock
I suppose I can throw out another name into the left field mess: Jason Bay. I'm getting this from Tracy Ringolsby's latest column:

"PIRATES: Are ready to retool, once again, and would like to move OF Jason Bay for prospects."

How much does this effect the Sox? Hard to say... but the only way that I could see this happening would be to take the prospects from a Garland deal and swing them for Bay. But as Jim said, there's a new sheriff in Pittsburgh so it's hard to tell exactly how he'll react.

I more bring this up for a frightening possibility. Cleveland could use an everyday LF, and they do have prospects. Bay in an Indians uniform= good-bye to any chance of competing in the near future.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 8:44 PM by Jim Margalus
I'd have to see if Bay is healthy, first. The Pirates have a horrendous medical staff, and he's been playing through pain for a couple years now.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 10:03 PM by ChicagoPete
Jim, this plan is pure madness. What's with this girlish obsession with Ross Gload? He's gone, time to move on.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Monday, November 05, 2007 10:22 PM by LongSox
Jim, I have a girlish obsession with seeing Konerko be leveraged for young talent.

OMIGOD!

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:00 AM by Jim Margalus
It's hard to get over losing a .323 hitter for Andrew Sisco. They need him. Hell, I need him. I'm a mess without him. I miss his laugh...

I'm not necessarily opposed to trading Konerko, but I just haven't heard a deal that guarantees the Sox will get better from it.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Tuesday, November 06, 2007 7:25 AM by Salty Dog
When this all gets sorted out, I think him and me should get an apartment together.

# re: My big, fat White Sox offseason plan

Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:52 PM by Roy Dean Bream
Johnny Damon would be the best 4th outfielder to start in CF for the Sox yet.

Progress.