posted on Friday, January 05, 2007 1:53 AM by Jim

This, that and the other

Brandon McCarthy refuses to get into war of words with the Sox.  That's good, because Williams didn't say anything objectionable or out of line. 

I've been chewing on this MLB.com piece on Sox catchers for a day, trying to figure out what to make of it.  Basically, it comes down to some quotes from A.J. Pierzynski that could use some context:

"I don't really want to lose at-bats and lose time back there.  Nobody has really talked to me about it, but you read some things how they got [Hall] to hit against lefties, and you look at our division and it's all lefties. So, you kind of read between the lines, but there's nothing I can do about it. I just hope he helps us win games and strengthen our team.

"Physically, I was fine and I felt great at the end [of 2006]. You are going to have ups and downs in every season, and I wasn't going to hit .315 the whole year. Basically, I had one bad month and finished up well."

I'm going to take these as typical athlete human quotes, because no competitive person is going to readily admit they need help.  But I suppose there always is the lingering threat of red-ass that could break through.

A.J. is right that he didn't completely break down -- rebounded well enough in September (.273/.309/.455) to make his abysmal August (.228/.265/.402) seem not so scary. 

On the other hand, against lefties, he crawled to the finish line.  Here's what Pierzynski posted against southpaws by month (ABs in parentheses):
  • April: .421/.476/.474 (19)
  • May: .154/.241/.154 (26)
  • June: .345/.367/.517 (29)
  • July: .368/.368/.368 (19)
  • August: .158/.158/.158 (19)
  • Sept/Oct: .207/.233/.241 (29)
April, June and July support his theory that he can hit lefties; May, August and September beg to differ.  Considering he posted OPSes of .626 of .524 against lefties in the two years prior to 2006, I think it's safe to say that occasionally he could use the help.

Speaking of catchers, here's why it's great to have Hall:

DENVER -- Talks between the Rockies and catchers Javier Lopez and Sal Fasano have reached a serious stage, as the club attempts to sign a veteran to provide competition and injury protection in camp...

...The Rockies also have interest in veteran Sandy Alomar Jr., who also played for Colorado in 2002, but discussions are further along with the other two. Alomar also has been talking with the Rangers, Mariners and D-backs, according to agent John Boggs.

While A.J.'s wanting as much playing time as possible, Lopez is a pretty good example of how catchers can fall off a cliff.  And should the Rockies sign Alomar, they'll have cut the White Sox's lead in "Times A Team Has Acquired Sandy Alomar Jr." to 3-2.

Comments

# re: This, that and the other

Friday, January 05, 2007 2:04 AM by Gregory Pratt
Lopez fell off because of steroids. You know that.

# re: This, that and the other

Friday, January 05, 2007 2:50 PM by MattTheRock
Damnit Jim, I've been hoping you didn't find that quote. So... from what I'm hearing out here, under my fresh six inches of snow, is that it's probably Lopez. If he's cheap, and I mean really really cheap, then you could maybe talk me into it. Outside of that, I tend to agree with Greg there, as his random power years have always seemed fishy to me. That and he's 35, with a declining bat, no arm to speak of, and I can't see why my team wouldn't want to bring him in. God what I wouldn't give for a major league payroll...

On a somewhat related note, Tucson is on. I got the surprising clearance to go, so give me a call and we can iron out the details.

# re: This, that and the other

Friday, January 05, 2007 10:56 PM by Jim Margalus
Yeah, but if steroids are the one and only explanation why he was a noteworthy catcher, then it explains why he got handsomely paid until age 35. Most catchers who have handled A.J.'s workload start their steep decline at an earlier age, 31 or 32.

If A.J.'s clean -- and his complete lack of jawline helps that case -- then he's on the cusp of getting crunched by Father Time. That's all I'm saying.

Matt, check your email.