posted on Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:20 AM by Jim

Jose Contreras

ESSENTIALS
2007 RECAP

Jose Contreras' 2007 season was ruined before it was started.  He was implicated in a smuggling case, served with a subpoena before he was set to throw the first pitch on Opening Day.

His first pitch was actually OK.  His second pitch, however, was taken over the right-field wall by Grady Sizemore, and it set the tone for not only the White Sox's season, but Contreras' as well.  He recorded only three outs that game, and finished the day with a 63.00 ERA.

Things could only get better from there, right?  Well, kinda.  Contreras did cut his ERA by 90 percent, but considering he went through an ugly divorce all the while, I'm sure whatever improvements he made didn't feel all that great.

For a while, Contreras was on pace to become the Sox's first 20-game loser since Wilbur Wood in 1975, and he couldn't pin it on bad luck.  When he was good -- like his shutout of the Twins May 10 -- he was rewarded with victories.  Through 12 starts, he was an ordinary 4-6 with a 4.23 ERA.  He didn't look as sharp, but he appeared to have weathered the worst of it.

Or so we thought.

Over his next nine starts, spanning 49 innings, Contreras gave up fewer than five runs only once.  He gave up hits by the boatload (82), and 11 left the yard.  He gave up three of the franchise-record eight homers against the Yankees July 31.  That start capped off a putrid three-pack of outings in which he gave up 26 runs over 15 innings, and he was sent to the bullpen with a 5-14 record and a 6.60 ERA.

He pouted after Ozzie's decision, just about demanding a trade, but he eventually adjusted and earned his way back into the rotation with five shutout innings in relief of a struggling Gavin Floyd Aug. 11.  Contreras started the rest of the way, and while he didn't light the world on fire (71 hits in 60 2/3 innings), he looked more confident and pitched more efficiently.

Slightly troubling is that his only great start was a shutout of the Royals Sept. 19 -- the team Lance Broadway would shut down eight days later.

GOOD SIGNS

No. 1: Heartbreak, not sciatica.
  Contreras' struggles in 2006 came after the DL trip for the shooting pain in his hip.  There wasn't much talk about injury issues last year, though perhaps because it would've been the least of his problems.

No. 2:  Home run rate.
  In the 21 starts surrounding that horrible stretch in the middle of the season, Contreras gave up only nine homers.  You can't discount the 11 in the other nine completely, but it helped him to survive despite declining peripherals in the beginning and end of the season.  He set a new full-season high with a groundball-flyball ratio of 1.33

No. 3:  Wild pitches.  After 16 in 2006, Contreras only threw three in 2007.  Maybe because his pitches lacked bite.

BAD SIGNS

No. 1: Hits. 
Even when he was labeled a bust with the Yankees in his first two seasons, he managed to allow under a hit an inning.  He went from giving up 8.91 hits per nine innings to 11.04, and as noted, that didn't improve even when he saw better results in the last month of the season.

No. 2: Strikeouts.  Since making his debut in 2003, his strikeout rate has tumbled:
  • 2003: 9.13 K/9IP
  • 2004: 7.92
  • 2005: 6.77
  • 2006: 6.15
  • 2007: 5.38
That's just about right for somebody who's entering his late 30s, unfortunately.

No. 3: Baserunners besides hits.  .He walked 62 in 189 innings, which isn't anywhere close to the worst of his career.  However, it is a significant increase over his 2006 walk rate, and he hit five more batters in seven fewer innings on top of that.  He finished second in the AL with 15 plunkings, and when you stack these on top of his ballooning hit rate, success will be unsustainable.

2008 OUTLOOK

It'll be a good season if...

For Contreras, I'm sure he'd be happy if he didn't experience another life-shattering event.  The Sox are going to need more, however, because the absence of Jon Garland puts pressure on Contreras to turn the Sox rotation from a glass half-empty to one half-full.

Contreras will have to reverse some scary trends in a hurry for that to happen -- his forkball's going to have to fork more, and his drop-down fastball is going to have to do... something besides deliver fastballs a couple miles per hour slower in hitters' wheelhouses.  I'd prefer it if he were only allowed to drop down twice a game.

Frank Thomas suffered a rough stretch during his nasty divorce and rebounded in MVP fashion.  But he was at least six years younger and his talent level was supernaturally high.  Contreras, these days, is merely ordinary, and he's going to have to develop some guile in order to survive.

It would help John Danks and Gavin Floyd (or another young starter) if he could top 200 innings.  Ozzie Guillen plans to situate him in the fourth starter spot to pick up any innings the young starters drop along the way, providing relief to the relievers.  That seems to be his primary purpose, and if he can get his ERA under 5.00 all the while, I suppose nobody could really complain.

That's not what he's getting paid to do exactly, but them's the breaks.  Contreras is a projector's nightmare, and anything between a 3.50 ERA and a 7.00 ERA is downright feasible.

PROJECTIONS

Jose Contreras
G
W-L
IP
H
HR BB K ERA
WHIP
2008 ZiPS
27
11-11
175 194 20 58 96 4.73 1.44
2008 BJS
30
10-12 196 200
23
70 141 4.27
1.29
2008 JCM
28
8-13
175 199 18
52 119 5.31 1.43

Comments

# re: Jose Contreras

Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:34 AM by ChicagoPete
Jim, pointing out the speck in KW's eye are we?

KW's put together a contending offense, but the big flaw in his plan is the starting pitching. All of Contreras' peripherals point toward continued deterioration, and you can't just yank a guy making $10mm/yr out of the rotation. Odds are that he'll suck, and you'll have to live with it. He's not missing any bats anymore, and what looks like a woeful defense is not going to bail him out. So now you're counting on Floyd and Danks to pick up the slack, and uh, I don't think so.

I think the key player for the pitching staff is Dotel. Not much has been said about him, but I really like this signing, very high upside potential, much more than Linebrink. Between Contreras, Danks and Floyd, one of them is probably going to be a disaster. Dotel's a swingman, and if by some miracle he's completely healthy he can move into the rotation and be a stud - his stuff is that good. With this defense, the Sox need starters with very high K rates and he fits the bill.

# re: Jose Contreras

Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:38 AM by Doctor Lingerie
After seeing James' projection for '08, I was totally baffled. Are we to assume his erratic velocity, delivery, and brain have somehow been de-scrambled?

And Pete, putting Dotel in the rotation? The fans in the front row would need some of those Gallagher concert tarps to protect against the exploding elbow cartilage. The defense isn't gonna be great, but really -- the guy's thrown the rough equivalent of 10 starts since the last presidential election.

# re: Jose Contreras

Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:45 AM by johnny_mostil
Only problem I have with this analysis is a quibble with the idea that pitchers control hit rates and "keep the ball in the park". I think the evidence is pretty clear that, mostly, they don't. "Preventing singles" is not a significant skill, except as a consequence of strikeouts.

Defenses dominate non-homer hit rates, as ChicagoPete implies.

# re: Jose Contreras

Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:07 AM by Jim Margalus
Yeah, the only way I see Dotel making an impact on the starting rotation is when he's trying to prevent balls in play when he's handling their inherited runners.

I largely agree with you Johnny, but I don't think it's entirely luck and defense when a "heavy fastball" guy sees his hit rates shoot up that dramatically. Looking at FanGraphs, it looks like he traded some fly balls for some line drives, and that seems about right. The contact was much more solid, because he couldn't hit spots.

Defense will probably nullify a sizable chunk of the improvement he makes, though, no doubt about it.

# re: Jose Contreras

Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:21 AM by ChicagoPete
"...The fans in the front row would need some of those Gallagher concert tarps to protect against the exploding elbow cartilage..."

Gentlemen, gentlemen, control your killing instincts - please note that I heavily qualified the if, "and IF by some MIRACLE he's completely healthy..." I don't see it happening either, but then again I didn't foresee Hermanson having a 0.00 ERA through June in 2005.

# re: Jose Contreras

Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:07 PM by Salty Dog
I hope the slurveball (or whatever that garbage is called) is out of Jose's inventory for 2008.

"...and he's going to have to develop some guile in order to survive."

SONIC BOOM!

- I'll show myself out.

# re: Jose Contreras

Thursday, January 31, 2008 3:51 PM by ChicagoPete
Definitely, the slurveball must go. And while we're at it, can we put an end to that weakass sidearm shit? That hasn't fooled anyone since '05.

# re: Jose Contreras

Thursday, January 31, 2008 4:05 PM by Jim Margalus
"Whatever that garbage is called."

It's the crazy-assed floater, is what it is.

# re: Jose Contreras

Saturday, June 07, 2008 1:52 PM by cubano
All you guys being negative about Jose and dont have any idea the kind of man this guy is. Ozzie knows that and kept Jose around and now he bounce back to be one of the best pichers in the AL. All you guys sucks and got no idea what jose went trough. Coming from a small town in Cuba where got nothing to eat (sometimes), no shoos to put on (when he was a child). Getting into the states (USA), everything is different. No family,later divorce the woman he trusted.
He is a winner.